<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 653 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296542</link>
    <description>An agreement to lease is chargeable as a lease under Article 36 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 only if it effects an immediate and present demise or transfers a present interest in the property. Here, the document repeatedly treated the occupier as a licensee, limited use to construction-related entry, and expressly postponed any legal interest until execution and registration of a future lease. It therefore remained a mere agreement to lease, not an operative lease in praesenti, and was not chargeable to stamp duty as a lease.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 653 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296542</link>
      <description>An agreement to lease is chargeable as a lease under Article 36 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 only if it effects an immediate and present demise or transfers a present interest in the property. Here, the document repeatedly treated the occupier as a licensee, limited use to construction-related entry, and expressly postponed any legal interest until execution and registration of a future lease. It therefore remained a mere agreement to lease, not an operative lease in praesenti, and was not chargeable to stamp duty as a lease.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>