<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 546 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296538</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the respondent-Corporation&#039;s right to adjust sale prices based on market conditions, including increased customs duty, dismissing the appellants&#039; challenge. It deemed the dispute purely contractual, lacking a public law element, and advised seeking remedy in Civil Courts. The Court clarified that the Corporation&#039;s actions did not breach Article 265 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 09:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 546 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296538</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the respondent-Corporation&#039;s right to adjust sale prices based on market conditions, including increased customs duty, dismissing the appellants&#039; challenge. It deemed the dispute purely contractual, lacking a public law element, and advised seeking remedy in Civil Courts. The Court clarified that the Corporation&#039;s actions did not breach Article 265 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>