https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410201 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of interest on the refund of the principal amount under the DVAT Act. It held that the petitioner failed to establish any patent illegality in the impugned order and pointed out the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 74 of the DVAT Act. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal or objection within two weeks, to be decided on merits within eight weeks, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies and maintaining neutrality on the controversy. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410201 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of interest on the refund of the principal amount under the DVAT Act. It held that the petitioner failed to establish any patent illegality in the impugned order and pointed out the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 74 of the DVAT Act. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal or objection within two weeks, to be decided on merits within eight weeks, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies and maintaining neutrality on the controversy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410201