<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1037 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410195</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed orders passed under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to lack of a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to be heard and absence of speaking orders. The Court emphasized natural justice principles, set aside the impugned orders, and directed for a fresh decision by the Assessing Authority. The appeal, initially rejected as time-barred, was reconsidered considering the valid explanation for delay due to COVID restrictions. The Court intervened, ruling in favor of the petitioner, stressing the importance of a fair opportunity to present the case. Various directions were given, including conducting proceedings through digital mode and ensuring no coercive steps against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1037 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410195</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed orders passed under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, due to lack of a reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to be heard and absence of speaking orders. The Court emphasized natural justice principles, set aside the impugned orders, and directed for a fresh decision by the Assessing Authority. The appeal, initially rejected as time-barred, was reconsidered considering the valid explanation for delay due to COVID restrictions. The Court intervened, ruling in favor of the petitioner, stressing the importance of a fair opportunity to present the case. Various directions were given, including conducting proceedings through digital mode and ensuring no coercive steps against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>