<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1035 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410193</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the impugned order condoning delay in filing a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. Emphasizing the importance of proper evaluation before taking cognizance, the Court directed both parties to appear promptly before the trial Court for further proceedings, highlighting the necessity of procedural adherence and fair legal processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1035 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410193</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the impugned order condoning delay in filing a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. Emphasizing the importance of proper evaluation before taking cognizance, the Court directed both parties to appear promptly before the trial Court for further proceedings, highlighting the necessity of procedural adherence and fair legal processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>