<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1025 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee, setting aside the assessment orders for the years in question. It was held that without incriminating material found during the search and seizure operation, the assessments under section 153A were invalid. As no pending proceedings existed during the relevant assessment years, the orders were deemed void ab initio. The importance of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A and adherence to procedural requirements were emphasized in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 08:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1025 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the assessee, setting aside the assessment orders for the years in question. It was held that without incriminating material found during the search and seizure operation, the assessments under section 153A were invalid. As no pending proceedings existed during the relevant assessment years, the orders were deemed void ab initio. The importance of incriminating material for assessments under section 153A and adherence to procedural requirements were emphasized in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>