<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1006 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The addition of Rs. 1,87,215 was sustained as unexplained cash deposits, while the remaining addition was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with reasonable explanations and documentation, especially in cases involving cash flow statements and unexplained deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 08:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1006 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The addition of Rs. 1,87,215 was sustained as unexplained cash deposits, while the remaining addition was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with reasonable explanations and documentation, especially in cases involving cash flow statements and unexplained deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>