<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296531</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Panel regarding the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, non-taxability of reinsurance premium income, and the application of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The judgments were based on established legal principles, precedents, and the specific facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 08:53:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1637 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296531</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the decisions of the Dispute Resolution Panel regarding the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, non-taxability of reinsurance premium income, and the application of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The judgments were based on established legal principles, precedents, and the specific facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>