<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 994 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410152</link>
    <description>A penalty order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was held unsustainable because it was passed without an effective opportunity of hearing. Although the assessee had been called for hearing, the scheduled date fell on a Sunday when the office was closed, and no further hearing was granted thereafter. The HC found this to be a breach of natural justice, quashed the penalty order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after affording a proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:14:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 994 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410152</link>
      <description>A penalty order under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act was held unsustainable because it was passed without an effective opportunity of hearing. Although the assessee had been called for hearing, the scheduled date fell on a Sunday when the office was closed, and no further hearing was granted thereafter. The HC found this to be a breach of natural justice, quashed the penalty order, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after affording a proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>