<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 989 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410147</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to use 01.04.1981 as the base year for calculating the indexed cost of acquisition, following the precedent set in the Manjula J. Shah case. The Court validated the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Bombay High Court decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. Additionally, the Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s entitlement to exemption under Section 54 for property purchased outside India and construction beyond the statutory time limit for the relevant assessment year (2010-11). The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues raised by the Revenue, dismissing the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 989 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410147</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to use 01.04.1981 as the base year for calculating the indexed cost of acquisition, following the precedent set in the Manjula J. Shah case. The Court validated the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Bombay High Court decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenge. Additionally, the Court affirmed the assessee&#039;s entitlement to exemption under Section 54 for property purchased outside India and construction beyond the statutory time limit for the relevant assessment year (2010-11). The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues raised by the Revenue, dismissing the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>