<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 977 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410135</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessment process, lack of authentic documents, and remanded the matter for fair adjudication. As the addition in dispute was set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision, the penalty could not be sustained. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair adjudication process and ensuring penalties are imposed lawfully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:13:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 977 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410135</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the assessment process, lack of authentic documents, and remanded the matter for fair adjudication. As the addition in dispute was set aside and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision, the penalty could not be sustained. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair adjudication process and ensuring penalties are imposed lawfully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>