<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1355 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on a road/bridge, citing previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee&#039;s favor and the lack of evidence showing reversal of Tribunal orders. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for all four years due to insufficient merit and failure to demonstrate any higher court overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:13:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1355 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim for depreciation on a road/bridge, citing previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee&#039;s favor and the lack of evidence showing reversal of Tribunal orders. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for all four years due to insufficient merit and failure to demonstrate any higher court overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>