<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 12 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26068</link>
    <description>The court allowed the civil rule, quashing the orders of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner of Income-tax. It directed the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to reconsider the application for a change in the &quot;previous year,&quot; taking into account the observations made by the court and the assessee-company&#039;s undertaking to accept conditions that would prevent any loss of revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:40:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 12 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26068</link>
      <description>The court allowed the civil rule, quashing the orders of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner of Income-tax. It directed the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner to reconsider the application for a change in the &quot;previous year,&quot; taking into account the observations made by the court and the assessee-company&#039;s undertaking to accept conditions that would prevent any loss of revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>