<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1337 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296522</link>
    <description>Drug price-control norms for conversion cost, packing charges and process loss were based on successive expert reports and available material; incomplete industry cooperation did not make the process arbitrary. Annual re-determination of those norms was not an inflexible requirement, permitting re-notification where circumstances and material remained unchanged. Retail and ceiling price notifications remained sustainable without a separate packing-material-cost norm because such costs were taken on actuals. Retail price fixation for formulations did not require prior fixation of bulk-drug prices, as the pricing scheme did not impose that condition. Judicial review of delegated price-control measures is confined to verifying application of the statutory formula on relevant material without arbitrariness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 09:13:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1337 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296522</link>
      <description>Drug price-control norms for conversion cost, packing charges and process loss were based on successive expert reports and available material; incomplete industry cooperation did not make the process arbitrary. Annual re-determination of those norms was not an inflexible requirement, permitting re-notification where circumstances and material remained unchanged. Retail and ceiling price notifications remained sustainable without a separate packing-material-cost norm because such costs were taken on actuals. Retail price fixation for formulations did not require prior fixation of bulk-drug prices, as the pricing scheme did not impose that condition. Judicial review of delegated price-control measures is confined to verifying application of the statutory formula on relevant material without arbitrariness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>