<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 965 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410123</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in an income tax appeal concerning deductions under Section 10B for exports made through third parties. The court allowed the appeal, quashing the tribunal&#039;s order, and held that exports through third parties should be deemed exports, entitling the assessee to Section 10B deductions. The court also emphasized the importance of considering relevant legal precedents, including decisions of the Jurisdictional Karnataka High Court, in reaching its decision. The judgment primarily focused on issues related to deductions for exports and compliance with legal precedents, without providing detailed analysis on the charging of interest under section 234 C of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 965 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410123</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee in an income tax appeal concerning deductions under Section 10B for exports made through third parties. The court allowed the appeal, quashing the tribunal&#039;s order, and held that exports through third parties should be deemed exports, entitling the assessee to Section 10B deductions. The court also emphasized the importance of considering relevant legal precedents, including decisions of the Jurisdictional Karnataka High Court, in reaching its decision. The judgment primarily focused on issues related to deductions for exports and compliance with legal precedents, without providing detailed analysis on the charging of interest under section 234 C of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>