<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 939 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410097</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the Commissioner&#039;s action was invalid as the specified domestic transaction provision had been omitted from the statute. The assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the order was pronounced on 16th July 2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 939 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410097</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the Commissioner&#039;s action was invalid as the specified domestic transaction provision had been omitted from the statute. The assessee&#039;s appeal was successful, and the order was pronounced on 16th July 2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>