<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1179 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Applicant, concluding that the delay in payment of the balance sale consideration was not the Applicant&#039;s fault. The interest demanded was deemed unjustified, and the amount paid under protest was to be refunded or adjusted by the Liquidator within 30 days. The Applicant was relieved of the obligation to pay the interest claimed by the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2021 09:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1179 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Applicant, concluding that the delay in payment of the balance sale consideration was not the Applicant&#039;s fault. The interest demanded was deemed unjustified, and the amount paid under protest was to be refunded or adjusted by the Liquidator within 30 days. The Applicant was relieved of the obligation to pay the interest claimed by the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>