<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 909 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410067</link>
    <description>The court directed the IT Redressal Committee to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s request for transition input tax credit under the GST regime in accordance with the law. The Grievance Cell was instructed to review the complaint submitted by the petitioner. The judgment emphasized adherence to the legal provisions governing the transition process and did not delve into the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 909 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410067</link>
      <description>The court directed the IT Redressal Committee to evaluate the petitioner&#039;s request for transition input tax credit under the GST regime in accordance with the law. The Grievance Cell was instructed to review the complaint submitted by the petitioner. The judgment emphasized adherence to the legal provisions governing the transition process and did not delve into the merits of the case. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>