https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410066 The judgment addressed the denial of CENVAT credit and recovery under the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging reliance on adjudication orders. The case involved allegations against the first appellant for procurement issues, supplier liabilities, validity of demands and penalties, document verification, extended limitation recovery, and the impact of findings on non-manufacture by suppliers. The judgment found the impugned order lacking legal qualifications and propriety, remanding for a fresh determination emphasizing natural justice and statutory provisions. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:59:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410066 The judgment addressed the denial of CENVAT credit and recovery under the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging reliance on adjudication orders. The case involved allegations against the first appellant for procurement issues, supplier liabilities, validity of demands and penalties, document verification, extended limitation recovery, and the impact of findings on non-manufacture by suppliers. The judgment found the impugned order lacking legal qualifications and propriety, remanding for a fresh determination emphasizing natural justice and statutory provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410066