<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 907 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410065</link>
    <description>ITAT held that CIT&#039;s revision under s.263 was unsustainable and upheld the AO&#039;s allowance of CSR contributions as deductions under s.80G. The tribunal found Parliament&#039;s express restriction in Explanation 2 to s.37 did not bar legitimate s.80G claims for donations other than the specified funds, and the donees satisfied s.80G approval requirements. The AO&#039;s view was plausible; there was no error or prejudice warranting revision. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 907 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410065</link>
      <description>ITAT held that CIT&#039;s revision under s.263 was unsustainable and upheld the AO&#039;s allowance of CSR contributions as deductions under s.80G. The tribunal found Parliament&#039;s express restriction in Explanation 2 to s.37 did not bar legitimate s.80G claims for donations other than the specified funds, and the donees satisfied s.80G approval requirements. The AO&#039;s view was plausible; there was no error or prejudice warranting revision. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>