<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 899 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410057</link>
    <description>Refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 27/2012-CE(NT) were found fit for fresh consideration because the supporting documents and notification conditions had not been adequately examined at the original stage. The claimant was to be given an opportunity to place the necessary records and explain the claim before the refund sanctioning authority. The matter was remanded for de novo processing of the refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 899 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410057</link>
      <description>Refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 27/2012-CE(NT) were found fit for fresh consideration because the supporting documents and notification conditions had not been adequately examined at the original stage. The claimant was to be given an opportunity to place the necessary records and explain the claim before the refund sanctioning authority. The matter was remanded for de novo processing of the refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>