<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 886 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the assessment order due to incorrect information, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 13,00,000/- based on cash deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of credible evidence and dismissed the interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The decision highlighted the necessity of adhering to legal principles concerning the burden of proof in tax cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 886 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the assessment order due to incorrect information, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 13,00,000/- based on cash deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of credible evidence and dismissed the interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The decision highlighted the necessity of adhering to legal principles concerning the burden of proof in tax cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>