<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 869 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410027</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant had paid excess tax, and the proper procedure for re-crediting the amount via Form PMT-03 was not followed. The proper officer was directed to process the refund in accordance with CGST Rules, re-crediting the excess tax to the Electronic Credit Ledger.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 869 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410027</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the appellant had paid excess tax, and the proper procedure for re-crediting the amount via Form PMT-03 was not followed. The proper officer was directed to process the refund in accordance with CGST Rules, re-crediting the excess tax to the Electronic Credit Ledger.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>