<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1860 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296483</link>
    <description>Receipt of fees or other amounts while carrying out charitable objects does not by itself destroy charitable character where the statutory test for commercial activity is not met. The Tribunal correctly held that educational, youth-centre, and general public utility activities remained charitable despite incidental receipts, so the proviso to Section 2(15) did not apply and exemption under Section 11 was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1860 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296483</link>
      <description>Receipt of fees or other amounts while carrying out charitable objects does not by itself destroy charitable character where the statutory test for commercial activity is not met. The Tribunal correctly held that educational, youth-centre, and general public utility activities remained charitable despite incidental receipts, so the proviso to Section 2(15) did not apply and exemption under Section 11 was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>