<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2074 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and dismissed the stay petitions as redundant. The delay in filing the appeals was condoned, and the cases were remitted to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with the imposition of costs on the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized a justice-oriented approach in interpreting &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and highlighted the need to balance substantial justice with technical considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:56:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2074 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and dismissed the stay petitions as redundant. The delay in filing the appeals was condoned, and the cases were remitted to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with the imposition of costs on the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized a justice-oriented approach in interpreting &quot;sufficient cause&quot; and highlighted the need to balance substantial justice with technical considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>