https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296487 The Supreme Court upheld the decision that the Respondent, Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 as it does not qualify as "State" under Article 12 and does not discharge public functions. The Court emphasized that private bodies like IBPS, engaged in voluntary activities without performing public duties akin to state actions, are not subject to writ jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed due to the Appellant's failure to provide the necessary caste certificate within the stipulated timeframe and lack of participation in subsequent recruitments, weakening his case for relief. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:56:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296487 The Supreme Court upheld the decision that the Respondent, Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS), is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 as it does not qualify as "State" under Article 12 and does not discharge public functions. The Court emphasized that private bodies like IBPS, engaged in voluntary activities without performing public duties akin to state actions, are not subject to writ jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed due to the Appellant's failure to provide the necessary caste certificate within the stipulated timeframe and lack of participation in subsequent recruitments, weakening his case for relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296487