https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296488 The proviso to Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act requires notice to the tenant, but it does not prescribe any fixed mode of service; notice may be oral or written, and a written notice need not be sent only by registered post. A photocopy of a certificate-of-posting receipt, supported by affidavit, is admissible under Section 34(1), and the surrounding circumstances may establish service, including the tenant's admission of tenancy and application to deposit rent. Concurrent factual findings on notice and comparative hardship are not to be disturbed without substantial basis, and the landlord is entitled to release of the shop where those findings stand. en-us Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:56:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296488 The proviso to Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings Act requires notice to the tenant, but it does not prescribe any fixed mode of service; notice may be oral or written, and a written notice need not be sent only by registered post. A photocopy of a certificate-of-posting receipt, supported by affidavit, is admissible under Section 34(1), and the surrounding circumstances may establish service, including the tenant's admission of tenancy and application to deposit rent. Concurrent factual findings on notice and comparative hardship are not to be disturbed without substantial basis, and the landlord is entitled to release of the shop where those findings stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296488