<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 4 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26044</link>
    <description>The court held that penalty under section 271(1)(a) can be imposed even after charging interest under section 139 for delayed submission of the return. Additionally, the penalty calculated on the basis of tax as on an unregistered firm could be levied when no tax was payable by it as a registered firm. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 4 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26044</link>
      <description>The court held that penalty under section 271(1)(a) can be imposed even after charging interest under section 139 for delayed submission of the return. Additionally, the penalty calculated on the basis of tax as on an unregistered firm could be levied when no tax was payable by it as a registered firm. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>