<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capitalization of Signages</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117372</link>
    <description>Signage costs are treated as revenue expenditure, not capital, because signages are not immovable property and do not create an asset of enduring benefit due to limited useful life and frequent replacement; contributors conclude these costs cannot be capitalised, and a query as to specific IND AS and Companies Act 2013 treatment remained unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Capitalization of Signages</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117372</link>
      <description>Signage costs are treated as revenue expenditure, not capital, because signages are not immovable property and do not create an asset of enduring benefit due to limited useful life and frequent replacement; contributors conclude these costs cannot be capitalised, and a query as to specific IND AS and Companies Act 2013 treatment remained unanswered.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:16:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>