https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296469 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's intervention under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which stalled the trial process and allowed accused individuals to manipulate the legal system, was inappropriate. The accused's abuse of court processes to evade arrest and delay proceedings was acknowledged. The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order, directing the Sessions Judge to proceed with sentencing the accused promptly. The accused were ordered to remain in custody until sentencing, emphasizing the importance of preventing misuse of legal processes and ensuring timely justice delivery. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:26:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296469 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's intervention under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which stalled the trial process and allowed accused individuals to manipulate the legal system, was inappropriate. The accused's abuse of court processes to evade arrest and delay proceedings was acknowledged. The Supreme Court quashed the High Court's order, directing the Sessions Judge to proceed with sentencing the accused promptly. The accused were ordered to remain in custody until sentencing, emphasizing the importance of preventing misuse of legal processes and ensuring timely justice delivery. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296469