https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296468 Criminal prosecution under Section 498 IPC was not quashed because the complaint was already pending before the Magistrate and no ground was found to disturb the High Court's refusal to interfere. The court nevertheless granted ancillary relief on attendance: the appellant's passport was to be returned on execution of a bond with solvent sureties, and he could appear through counsel except when his personal presence was imperatively required, with physical appearance dispensed with on proper application. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue, subject to safeguards balancing hardship against the need to secure attendance at trial. en-us Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:23:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296468 Criminal prosecution under Section 498 IPC was not quashed because the complaint was already pending before the Magistrate and no ground was found to disturb the High Court's refusal to interfere. The court nevertheless granted ancillary relief on attendance: the appellant's passport was to be returned on execution of a bond with solvent sureties, and he could appear through counsel except when his personal presence was imperatively required, with physical appearance dispensed with on proper application. The proceedings were therefore allowed to continue, subject to safeguards balancing hardship against the need to secure attendance at trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296468