https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467 The SC set aside the HC's order allowing the accused to remain on bail after the offence was upgraded to Section 304 IPC. The SC emphasized that the HC improperly used its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. instead of following the procedure under Section 439 Cr.P.C., which requires fresh bail applications after charge conversion. The SC also nullified subsequent bail orders under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, directing the accused into custody but permitting them to apply for bail anew according to the law. The SC highlighted the need for judicious use of inherent powers to prevent procedural circumvention. en-us Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467 The SC set aside the HC's order allowing the accused to remain on bail after the offence was upgraded to Section 304 IPC. The SC emphasized that the HC improperly used its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. instead of following the procedure under Section 439 Cr.P.C., which requires fresh bail applications after charge conversion. The SC also nullified subsequent bail orders under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, directing the accused into custody but permitting them to apply for bail anew according to the law. The SC highlighted the need for judicious use of inherent powers to prevent procedural circumvention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467