<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 768 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467</link>
    <description>Inherent criminal jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass a specific statutory bail remedy when an offence is converted into a graver charge. The accused were required to seek bail afresh under the ordinary bail provisions, and continuation of bail through inherent powers was impermissible because the High Court bypassed the prescribed procedure without any exceptional circumstance such as miscarriage of justice or patent illegality. The direction was therefore illegal and set aside, with liberty reserved to apply for bail in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 768 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467</link>
      <description>Inherent criminal jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass a specific statutory bail remedy when an offence is converted into a graver charge. The accused were required to seek bail afresh under the ordinary bail provisions, and continuation of bail through inherent powers was impermissible because the High Court bypassed the prescribed procedure without any exceptional circumstance such as miscarriage of justice or patent illegality. The direction was therefore illegal and set aside, with liberty reserved to apply for bail in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>