<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 867 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410025</link>
    <description>The court entertained the petitioner&#039;s challenge against the order under the GST Act, directing the Revenue to file a counter affidavit. The petitioner was directed to deposit the remaining disputed tax amount within three weeks, with a stay on recovery proceedings until resolution. The court allowed the petition to proceed regarding the imposition of penalty and tax, emphasizing compliance with Section 112 (8) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 867 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410025</link>
      <description>The court entertained the petitioner&#039;s challenge against the order under the GST Act, directing the Revenue to file a counter affidavit. The petitioner was directed to deposit the remaining disputed tax amount within three weeks, with a stay on recovery proceedings until resolution. The court allowed the petition to proceed regarding the imposition of penalty and tax, emphasizing compliance with Section 112 (8) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>