<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 865 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410023</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, directing expert bodies to proceed with pending proceedings, consider petitioner&#039;s submissions, and pass orders expeditiously. The court emphasized adherence to principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Virlon&#039;s case, deferring technical adjudication to CESTAT and Commissioner of Central Excise for detailed examination of records and policy decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 865 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410023</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition, directing expert bodies to proceed with pending proceedings, consider petitioner&#039;s submissions, and pass orders expeditiously. The court emphasized adherence to principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Virlon&#039;s case, deferring technical adjudication to CESTAT and Commissioner of Central Excise for detailed examination of records and policy decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>