https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410017 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the authorities' decision to include turnover from the VAT regime as part of the "preceding financial year" for the composite scheme under Section 10(1) of the GST Act. The petitioner's attempt to exclude VAT turnover was rejected, affirming the demand for GST at 28% from 1.7.2017. The court found the Department's actions legal, emphasizing the transition to GST aimed at tax uniformity and preventing evasion. en-us Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Mar 2022 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410017 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the authorities' decision to include turnover from the VAT regime as part of the "preceding financial year" for the composite scheme under Section 10(1) of the GST Act. The petitioner's attempt to exclude VAT turnover was rejected, affirming the demand for GST at 28% from 1.7.2017. The court found the Department's actions legal, emphasizing the transition to GST aimed at tax uniformity and preventing evasion. Case-Laws GST Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410017