<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 855 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor breached payment terms in the Settlement Agreement, leading to defaults in repayment obligations. The Financial Creditor was allowed to revive the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to these defaults. The Tribunal admitted the petition, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to manage the CIRP proceedings until completion or approval of a resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 855 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor breached payment terms in the Settlement Agreement, leading to defaults in repayment obligations. The Financial Creditor was allowed to revive the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) due to these defaults. The Tribunal admitted the petition, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to manage the CIRP proceedings until completion or approval of a resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>