<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Dishonor on Second Presentation Not Valid for Prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58884</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - the said bouncing of cheques on second presentation cannot be a ground for prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as one of the conditions precedent for prosecution i.e the cheque itself should be valid on the date of its presentation, is not satisfied when the cheques are returned as not acceptable to the bank on account of being non-MICR cheques. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:57:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:57:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Dishonor on Second Presentation Not Valid for Prosecution u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58884</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - the said bouncing of cheques on second presentation cannot be a ground for prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as one of the conditions precedent for prosecution i.e the cheque itself should be valid on the date of its presentation, is not satisfied when the cheques are returned as not acceptable to the bank on account of being non-MICR cheques. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:57:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>