<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 847 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410005</link>
    <description>The court found the prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 invalid due to the non-MICR status of the cheques on their second presentation. The service of the demand notice under a certificate of posting was not proven, and the complaint was filed prematurely. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the petitioner was discharged from the liability of the bail bonds. The revision petition was allowed, and the lower court records were ordered to be sent back.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 847 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410005</link>
      <description>The court found the prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 invalid due to the non-MICR status of the cheques on their second presentation. The service of the demand notice under a certificate of posting was not proven, and the complaint was filed prematurely. Consequently, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the petitioner was discharged from the liability of the bail bonds. The revision petition was allowed, and the lower court records were ordered to be sent back.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>