https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410000 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to refund the specified amount within fifteen days, along with interest as per the Act. The Court criticized the respondents for delaying the refund process and emphasized that refunds should be considered statutory obligations rather than favors. The Court highlighted the importance of timely refunds under the Act and compared the process to that under the Income Tax Act. The respondents were also ordered to pay costs to the petitioner, bringing closure to the pending petitions. en-us Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2021 22:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410000 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the respondents to refund the specified amount within fifteen days, along with interest as per the Act. The Court criticized the respondents for delaying the refund process and emphasized that refunds should be considered statutory obligations rather than favors. The Court highlighted the importance of timely refunds under the Act and compared the process to that under the Income Tax Act. The respondents were also ordered to pay costs to the petitioner, bringing closure to the pending petitions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=410000