https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409997 The court set aside the order for re-opening assessment due to the respondent's failure to consider the petitioner's objections adequately, including not providing the sanctioning order by the Commissioner. Emphasizing the need for meaningful disposal of objections, the court remanded the matter for a fresh consideration of the objections raised by the petitioner, directing the respondent to pass a speaking order promptly. The writ petition was allowed without costs to either party. en-us Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:57:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409997 The court set aside the order for re-opening assessment due to the respondent's failure to consider the petitioner's objections adequately, including not providing the sanctioning order by the Commissioner. Emphasizing the need for meaningful disposal of objections, the court remanded the matter for a fresh consideration of the objections raised by the petitioner, directing the respondent to pass a speaking order promptly. The writ petition was allowed without costs to either party. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409997