https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409996 The court upheld the 2nd respondent's decision to reject the application under Rule 60 of the Telangana VAT Rules, emphasizing that only clerical and arithmetical mistakes in the assessment order can be rectified under the rule. The court found no error warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to the dismissal of the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of the application. en-us Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:57:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409996 The court upheld the 2nd respondent's decision to reject the application under Rule 60 of the Telangana VAT Rules, emphasizing that only clerical and arithmetical mistakes in the assessment order can be rectified under the rule. The court found no error warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to the dismissal of the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of the application. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409996