https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409995 Where an appellate order affirming conviction is challenged, the Code of Criminal Procedure's specific revisional remedy under Sections 397 and 401 governs, and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 should not be used as an alternative where that remedy is available. A compromise between the parties does not, by itself, create an exceptional circumstance justifying bypass of revision; settlement may still be considered in revision. The extraordinary power under Section 482 remains confined to rare cases of abuse of process or grave injustice. The commentary therefore treats revision as the proper route and excludes routine resort to inherent powers. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409995 Where an appellate order affirming conviction is challenged, the Code of Criminal Procedure's specific revisional remedy under Sections 397 and 401 governs, and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 should not be used as an alternative where that remedy is available. A compromise between the parties does not, by itself, create an exceptional circumstance justifying bypass of revision; settlement may still be considered in revision. The extraordinary power under Section 482 remains confined to rare cases of abuse of process or grave injustice. The commentary therefore treats revision as the proper route and excludes routine resort to inherent powers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409995