<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Order on Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Criticized for Irrelevant and Incorrect Observations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58881</link>
    <description>Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has made irrelevant observation in his appellate order, which are not only factually incorrect but have no relationship to the issue by way of penalty u/s.271(1)(c). This amply reflects lack of application of mind by the ld. CIT(A). - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:56:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Order on Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Criticized for Irrelevant and Incorrect Observations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58881</link>
      <description>Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has made irrelevant observation in his appellate order, which are not only factually incorrect but have no relationship to the issue by way of penalty u/s.271(1)(c). This amply reflects lack of application of mind by the ld. CIT(A). - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:56:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=58881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>