<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 833 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409991</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition of an unsecured loan/deposit and the disallowance of expenses. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) did not provide sufficient opportunity for the assessee to present additional evidence, leading to the remand of both issues for reassessment based on the additional evidence to be filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 833 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409991</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) to re-examine the addition of an unsecured loan/deposit and the disallowance of expenses. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) did not provide sufficient opportunity for the assessee to present additional evidence, leading to the remand of both issues for reassessment based on the additional evidence to be filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>