<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1908 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was legally untenable as the Assessing Officer did not record satisfaction or initiate the penalty in the assessment order. The Tribunal quashed the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c), dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the Cross Objection of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1908 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was legally untenable as the Assessing Officer did not record satisfaction or initiate the penalty in the assessment order. The Tribunal quashed the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c), dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the Cross Objection of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>