https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296455 The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty imposition under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for passing ineligible Cenvat credit to purchasers. The court determined that penalties under Rule 26 were more appropriate than those under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasizes the significance of complying with specific provisions of the Central Excise Rules to avoid penalties and legal consequences. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296455 The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty imposition under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for passing ineligible Cenvat credit to purchasers. The court determined that penalties under Rule 26 were more appropriate than those under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasizes the significance of complying with specific provisions of the Central Excise Rules to avoid penalties and legal consequences. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296455