<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1271 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296465</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the applications for setting aside the ex-parte decree due to the lack of sufficient cause for the Appellants&#039; non-appearance. The appeal against the preliminary decree for Schedule B property should have been dismissed in default, but the Supreme Court found no reason to recall this dismissal. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1271 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296465</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the applications for setting aside the ex-parte decree due to the lack of sufficient cause for the Appellants&#039; non-appearance. The appeal against the preliminary decree for Schedule B property should have been dismissed in default, but the Supreme Court found no reason to recall this dismissal. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>