https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296446 The court partially allowed the appeal, awarding the plaintiff a decree of Rs. 2,02,960.00 as damages due to fraudulent misrepresentation in the suit contracts. The plaintiff was entitled to be compensated for the additional costs incurred. The court dismissed the plaintiff's alternative claim of Rs. 84,800 and the claim for additional payment for office construction, holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to further payment beyond the stipulated rate in the contract. en-us Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:31:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296446 The court partially allowed the appeal, awarding the plaintiff a decree of Rs. 2,02,960.00 as damages due to fraudulent misrepresentation in the suit contracts. The plaintiff was entitled to be compensated for the additional costs incurred. The court dismissed the plaintiff's alternative claim of Rs. 84,800 and the claim for additional payment for office construction, holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to further payment beyond the stipulated rate in the contract. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296446