<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and canceling the orders transferring the disputed property. It emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and the detrimental effects of fraud in legal matters, citing precedents to support its stance. The Court highlighted the lack of jurisdiction and procedural irregularities in the Custodian&#039;s actions, deeming subsequent actions null and void. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and canceling the orders transferring the disputed property. It emphasized the significance of procedural compliance and the detrimental effects of fraud in legal matters, citing precedents to support its stance. The Court highlighted the lack of jurisdiction and procedural irregularities in the Custodian&#039;s actions, deeming subsequent actions null and void. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>