<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</link>
    <description>Suppression of earlier proceedings concerning the same property, combined with failure to follow the statutory transfer procedure, rendered the later transfer unlawful and ineffective. The Court noted that the Custodian&#039;s power under evacuee property law was protective in nature and that transfer required compliance with mandated process, including notice and prior approval where necessary. Because the 1982 transfer and sale certificate were obtained by concealment of material facts and without notice to affected parties, fraud and abuse of statutory power struck at the root of the order and displaced any equitable protection. The cancellation of the later transfer orders and dismissal of the connected writ petitions were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1075 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</link>
      <description>Suppression of earlier proceedings concerning the same property, combined with failure to follow the statutory transfer procedure, rendered the later transfer unlawful and ineffective. The Court noted that the Custodian&#039;s power under evacuee property law was protective in nature and that transfer required compliance with mandated process, including notice and prior approval where necessary. Because the 1982 transfer and sale certificate were obtained by concealment of material facts and without notice to affected parties, fraud and abuse of statutory power struck at the root of the order and displaced any equitable protection. The cancellation of the later transfer orders and dismissal of the connected writ petitions were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>