<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 822 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409980</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the orders of the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling and Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling, requiring GST registration for a medical store operated by a charitable trust. It determined that providing medicines, even at reduced rates, constituted a supply of goods in the course of business, necessitating registration. Despite the trust&#039;s argument that its activities were non-commercial and for charitable purposes, the Court found that the sale of medicines fell within the definition of business under the CGST Act. As a result, the petition challenging the orders was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=650284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 822 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409980</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the orders of the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling and Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling, requiring GST registration for a medical store operated by a charitable trust. It determined that providing medicines, even at reduced rates, constituted a supply of goods in the course of business, necessitating registration. Despite the trust&#039;s argument that its activities were non-commercial and for charitable purposes, the Court found that the sale of medicines fell within the definition of business under the CGST Act. As a result, the petition challenging the orders was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>